The Fishing Website : Discussion Forums : whos chicken now https://www.fishing.net.nz/forum/ Sun, 21 Jun 2026 00:51:59 +0000 Fri, 21 May 2004 21:54:30 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 12.01 360 https://www.fishing.net.nz/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=458 <![CDATA[The Fishing Website : Discussion Forums]]> https://www.fishing.net.nz/forum/forum_images/web_wiz_forums.png https://www.fishing.net.nz/forum/ <![CDATA[whos chicken now : I have heard, but cannot swear,...]]> https://www.fishing.net.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=458&PID=56820&title=whos-chicken-now#56820 Author: Fishful Thinking
Subject: 458
Posted: 21 May 2004 at 9:54pm

I have heard, but cannot swear, that in some counties some bait additives are illegal. South Africa - Aniseed, USA - WD 40 lubricant. Chicken may infringe IGFA regs as a so called butchers bait, anyone confirm or deny the others??   F.T.]]> Fri, 21 May 2004 21:54:30 +0000 https://www.fishing.net.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=458&PID=56820&title=whos-chicken-now#56820 <![CDATA[whos chicken now : They said flesh. blood etc, So...]]> https://www.fishing.net.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=458&PID=56785&title=whos-chicken-now#56785 Author: bluefox_13
Subject: 458
Posted: 21 May 2004 at 7:09pm

They said flesh. blood etc, So what if you got the children to just hang onto the hook, then drag them behind the boat..... Just say that you forgot the biscuit for them to ride on adn this will have to do for the day

 

]]> Fri, 21 May 2004 19:09:06 +0000 https://www.fishing.net.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=458&PID=56785&title=whos-chicken-now#56785 <![CDATA[whos chicken now : what children? ]]> https://www.fishing.net.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=458&PID=56783&title=whos-chicken-now#56783 Author: Jo.
Subject: 458
Posted: 21 May 2004 at 7:00pm

what children?

 

]]> Fri, 21 May 2004 19:00:01 +0000 https://www.fishing.net.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=458&PID=56783&title=whos-chicken-now#56783 <![CDATA[whos chicken now : rather eat the stuff myself. ]]> https://www.fishing.net.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=458&PID=56779&title=whos-chicken-now#56779 Author: cod
Subject: 458
Posted: 21 May 2004 at 5:57pm

rather eat the stuff myself.]]> Fri, 21 May 2004 17:57:10 +0000 https://www.fishing.net.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=458&PID=56779&title=whos-chicken-now#56779 <![CDATA[whos chicken now : and dead guys thatcouldnt pay...]]> https://www.fishing.net.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=458&PID=56769&title=whos-chicken-now#56769 Author: Peter da Squid
Subject: 458
Posted: 21 May 2004 at 4:47pm

and dead guys that couldnt pay their debts.

]]> Fri, 21 May 2004 16:47:20 +0000 https://www.fishing.net.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=458&PID=56769&title=whos-chicken-now#56769 <![CDATA[whos chicken now : so are children ]]> https://www.fishing.net.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=458&PID=56763&title=whos-chicken-now#56763 Author: Jo.
Subject: 458
Posted: 21 May 2004 at 4:22pm

so are children ]]> Fri, 21 May 2004 16:22:01 +0000 https://www.fishing.net.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=458&PID=56763&title=whos-chicken-now#56763 <![CDATA[whos chicken now : but based &#111;n the above rules...]]> https://www.fishing.net.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=458&PID=56759&title=whos-chicken-now#56759 Author: backlash
Subject: 458
Posted: 21 May 2004 at 3:35pm

but based on the above rules - Kittens are definitely out - sorry Tobes!]]> Fri, 21 May 2004 15:35:55 +0000 https://www.fishing.net.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=458&PID=56759&title=whos-chicken-now#56759 <![CDATA[whos chicken now : &#079;nly thing I can see in the...]]> https://www.fishing.net.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=458&PID=56758&title=whos-chicken-now#56758 Author: backlash
Subject: 458
Posted: 21 May 2004 at 3:34pm

Only thing I can see in the IGFA rules is that

The following acts will disqualify a catch:

6. Chumming with or using as bait the flesh, blood, skin or any part of mammals other than hair or pork rind used in lures designed for trolling or casting.

12. Using a size or kind of bait that is illegal to possess.

I presume 12 applies to undersized fish used as bait. I can't see any mention of NOT being able to use chicken (or any other bird).

This was taken from the IGFA rules on this site. I checked the IGFA.org site but it does not seem to have any more than that. Anyone got a more definitive view? ruling?

 

 

]]> Fri, 21 May 2004 15:34:06 +0000 https://www.fishing.net.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=458&PID=56758&title=whos-chicken-now#56758 <![CDATA[whos chicken now : Carefull there Bent &#111;ne,...]]> https://www.fishing.net.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=458&PID=56754&title=whos-chicken-now#56754 Author: Fishful Thinking
Subject: 458
Posted: 21 May 2004 at 2:56pm

Carefull there Bent one, you'll give all us selfish, insensitive, drunken lechers a bad name with the hand knitted socks and leather sandals lot who prowl these sites to gather evidence to support their claims that all living things need massive reserves to protect them from us.

Besides, I thought you normally live bait with takahae. Cheers, F.T.

Difference between kinky and perverted ?, one uses a feather, the other a whole chicken.

]]> Fri, 21 May 2004 14:56:20 +0000 https://www.fishing.net.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=458&PID=56754&title=whos-chicken-now#56754 <![CDATA[whos chicken now : I can&#039;t answer the chicken...]]> https://www.fishing.net.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=458&PID=56752&title=whos-chicken-now#56752 Author: Bender
Subject: 458
Posted: 21 May 2004 at 2:21pm

I can't answer the chicken question, but we were fishing off Tiri in the Hauraki Gulf when we ran short of bait.

As we were less than 50m from the shore, we baited some sabikis with bread, and cast them ashore. We hooked a real good Kakapo, which was quite fun to play while on shore, but they don't swim to good.

We used it for bait but it didn't catch anything of note, so I can only surmise that these birds are not good bait.

 

 

]]> Fri, 21 May 2004 14:21:35 +0000 https://www.fishing.net.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=458&PID=56752&title=whos-chicken-now#56752