Print Page | Close Window

600-year-old canoe

Printed From: The Fishing Website
Category: Saltwater Fishing
Forum Name: The Briny Bar
Forum Description: The place for general chat on saltwater fishing!
URL: https://www.fishing.net.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=104235
Printed Date: 06 Jul 2026 at 9:42am


Topic: 600-year-old canoe
Posted By: Lethal
Subject: 600-year-old canoe
Date Posted: 01 Oct 2014 at 11:35pm
A piece of that early heritage was recently revealed on a beach in New Zealand, when a 600-year-old canoe with a turtle carved on its hull emerged from a sand dune after a harsh storm. The researchers who examined the shipwreck say the vessel is more impressive than any other canoe previously linked to this period in New Zealand



In New Zealand, human history only began around 1200-1300, when http://www.livescience.com/11359-top-10-intrepid-explorers.html" rel="nofollow - intrepid voyagers arrived by boat through several journeys over some generations.

The canoe was revealed near the sheltered Anaweka estuary, on the northwestern end of New Zealand's South Island.

"It kind of took my breath away, really, because it was so carefully constructed and so big," said Dilys Johns, a senior research fellow at the University of Auckland in New Zealand.

The hull measured about 20 feet long and it was made from matai, or black pine, found in New Zealand. The boat had carved interior ribs and clear evidence of repair and reuse. Carbon dating tests showed that the vessel was last caulked with wads of bark in 1400.

Johns and colleagues say it's likely that the hull once had a twin, and together, these vessels formed a double canoe (though the researchers haven't ruled out the possibility that the find could have been a single canoe with an outrigger). If the ship was a double canoe, it probably had a deck, a shelter and a sail that was pitched forward, much like the historic canoes of the Society Islands (a group that includes Bora Bora and Tahiti) and the Southern Cook Islands. These island chains have been identified as likely Polynesian homelands of the Maori, the group of indigenous people who settled New Zealand.

The boat was surprisingly more sophisticated than the canoes described centuries later by the first Europeans to arrive in New Zealand, Johns told Live Science. At the time of European contact, the Maori were using dugout canoes, which were hollowed out from single, big trees with no internal frames. In the smaller islands of Polynesia, boat builders didn't have access to trees that were big enough to make an entire canoe; to build a vessel, therefore, they had to create an elaborate arrangement of smaller wooden planks.

The newly described canoe seems to represent a mix of that ancestral plank technology and an adaptation to the new resources on New Zealand, since the boat has some big, hollowed-out portions but also sophisticated internal ribs, Johns and colleagues wrote.

The turtle carving on the boat also seems to link back to the settlers' homeland. Turtle designs are rare in pre-European carvings in New Zealand, but widespread in Polynesia, where turtles were important in mythology and could represent humans or even gods in artwork. In many traditional Polynesian societies, only the elite were allowed to eat turtles, the study's authors noted.

http://www.foxnews.com/science/2014/09/30/sophisticated-600-year-old-canoe-discovered-in-new-zealand/" rel="nofollow - http://www.foxnews.com/science/2014/09/30/sophisticated-600-year-old-canoe-discovered-in-new-zealand/



-------------
Thanks for everything you did for us Eric. may you rest in peace, You were one of the real legends of NZ recreational fishing



Replies:
Posted By: red rooster
Date Posted: 02 Oct 2014 at 12:49am
wicked !
 theres alot of history at the top of the south 
amazing things like this still getting diacovered


Posted By: Reel Deal
Date Posted: 02 Oct 2014 at 4:29am
Stunning

-------------
The gods do not subtract from the allotted span of men's lives the hours spent on fishing - Assyrian Proverb


Posted By: lemmy
Date Posted: 02 Oct 2014 at 5:26am
I ca,nt recall ever seeing a turtle carved by Maori before,although there are some cave paintings in the South Island of crocodiles.
Maybe it was the Cuzzys from Rarotonga coming down for a holiday.
Little bit off topic but have any of the members visited the Sundee Site on Mototaupo which was discovered in 1981 was thinking of taking the kids there over summer?


Posted By: Reel Deal
Date Posted: 02 Oct 2014 at 8:39am
I think your summary Lemmy was what the article was pointing to. just stunning craftsmanship.
I see an error though. They say human history started 1200,1300 when they meant Maori History.
Plenty of evidence of humans long before that.

-------------
The gods do not subtract from the allotted span of men's lives the hours spent on fishing - Assyrian Proverb


Posted By: Capt Asparagus
Date Posted: 02 Oct 2014 at 9:29am
No no no! Not possible! :-)
That is cool about that canoe, isn't it. The folks in the cooks insist that their people were the ones that came to nz.

-------------
It is only my overwhelming natural humility that mars my perfection.

Captain Asparagus, Superhero, Adventurer.


Posted By: v8-coupe
Date Posted: 02 Oct 2014 at 12:40pm
Originally posted by Capt Asparagus Capt Asparagus wrote:

No no no! Not possible! :-)
That is cool about that canoe, isn't it. The folks in the cooks insist that their people were the ones that came to nz.


And if you believe in the DNA trail they are all of Asian descent.
Watched a very interesting documentary which followed their progress from Asia through the Islands and finally to New Zealand.
They did DNA tests, language transition and archaeology. Really interesting.
Now to throw a spanner in the works. There has been evidence found of a culture here before early Maori. In fact ancient Maori oral tradition/stories mention it themselves.
A few years ago an ancient sunken Phoenician port and boats were discovered in Australia. If they made it that far, how hard would it have been to sail to New Zealand. Could they have been the people early Maori say were already here when they arrived?

P.S. Love the Turtle.

-------------
Legasea Legend Member


Posted By: AlexFyssher
Date Posted: 02 Oct 2014 at 12:50pm
S**t that's pretty cool


Posted By: lemmy
Date Posted: 02 Oct 2014 at 6:28pm
Makes you wonder how many of the boats built in New Zealand in recent years will still be around in 600 years time ?


Posted By: Capt Asparagus
Date Posted: 02 Oct 2014 at 6:44pm
Some say that the Chinese were here in the early Ming Dynasty too.....that is 1400-1450

-------------
It is only my overwhelming natural humility that mars my perfection.

Captain Asparagus, Superhero, Adventurer.


Posted By: lemmy
Date Posted: 02 Oct 2014 at 7:12pm
Originally posted by Reel Deal Reel Deal wrote:

I think your summary Lemmy was what the article was pointing to. just stunning craftsmanship.
I see an error though. They say human history started 1200,1300 when they meant Maori History.
Plenty of evidence of humans long before that.


Whoops yeah should have read the article first,.
 I,ve done a fair bit of research into early New Zealand Habitation and a yet to see one bit of solid evidence of Humans being here in any numbers before Maori colonised it in 1200 ,1300 most will agree it is possible some Asian Mariners came and went .
And I know about all the rat bones,stone villages,Celts etc etc,still to see one bit of solid evidence and I know all the conspiracy theorys will say it has been hidden from us maybe it has??? 


Posted By: Godders
Date Posted: 02 Oct 2014 at 7:15pm
I had a 600 year old canoe once but was too heavy and hard to retrieve on my own.


Posted By: krow
Date Posted: 02 Oct 2014 at 8:22pm
Originally posted by Godders Godders wrote:

I had a 600 year old canoe once but was too heavy and hard to retrieve on my own.
so you buried it in the sand.


Posted By: fish-feeder
Date Posted: 03 Oct 2014 at 8:33am
Lemmy,how about the FACT that the nga puhi chief David rankin says they wernt the first ones here? Or all the stories from the tribes around rotorua and taupo saying that they wernt here first...or the fact that the koru pa at taranaki was built at a time when there was clear evidence that not enough people were in NZ let alone taranaki to build it...and man it effectively....it was printed that it was built a long time before the maori were said to arrive? Or the spanish armour found at pouto,or the aboriginal boomerang found in dargaville,or the tamil bell found in wellington harbour,or the 7-8ft tall skeletons found in the raglan caves...with long platted red hair,and samples of a woven tartan cloth found with them.There is alot of evidence hidden and its sad,because its our history,european or maori,we have the right to know.Some sites are worthy of Unesco preservation,but DOC shoves it all under the carpet.
One tribe had its MDNA traced back to iran,as mentioned in the tribes stories,they always knew where and when they came from........


-------------
dont get my personality mixed up with my attitude,my personality is me,my attitude depends on you.


Posted By: Capt Asparagus
Date Posted: 03 Oct 2014 at 9:00am
Hmmmmmmm....... 7 to 8 foot tall skeletons....who were they, aliens? Or super tall red haired Masai? :-)

What about the moriori though? (Try slipping moriori past bloody iPads autocorrect! Sheeesshhhh)

I would not be surprised the Chinese visited here, given the Chinese DNA in Maori, that could have happened. Forget the phonecians, celts etc though, that is just fantasy.

-------------
It is only my overwhelming natural humility that mars my perfection.

Captain Asparagus, Superhero, Adventurer.


Posted By: AlexFyssher
Date Posted: 03 Oct 2014 at 9:05am
Originally posted by lemmy lemmy wrote:

Originally posted by Reel Deal Reel Deal wrote:

I think your summary Lemmy was what the article was pointing to. just stunning craftsmanship.
I see an error though. They say human history started 1200,1300 when they meant Maori History.
Plenty of evidence of humans long before that.


Whoops yeah should have read the article first,.
 I,ve done a fair bit of research into early New Zealand Habitation and a yet to see one bit of solid evidence of Humans being here in any numbers before Maori colonised it in 1200 ,1300 most will agree it is possible some Asian Mariners came and went .
And I know about all the rat bones,stone villages,Celts etc etc,still to see one bit of solid evidence and I know all the conspiracy theorys will say it has been hidden from us maybe it has??? 


Have you read The Great Divide? (I haven't but my brother has and seems very interesting, will start it soon)


Posted By: Harmul
Date Posted: 03 Oct 2014 at 9:21am
Originally posted by Capt Asparagus Capt Asparagus wrote:

Hmmmmmmm....... 7 to 8 foot tall skeletons....who were they, aliens? Or super tall red haired Masai? :-)

What about the moriori though? (Try slipping moriori past bloody iPads autocorrect! Sheeesshhhh)

I would not be surprised the Chinese visited here, given the Chinese DNA in Maori, that could have happened. Forget the phonecians, celts etc though, that is just fantasy.


You cant tell me that you havnt heard about the 8 foot skeletons? There is so much of NZ's history out there that hasn't been revealed. I don't believe everything I read, but the evidence keeps on adding up that the moriori and the maori were not the first ones here.
However, everyone must make up their own minds on the different theories as there is also a lot of bull dust theories out there as well.


Posted By: AlexFyssher
Date Posted: 03 Oct 2014 at 9:29am
Originally posted by fish-feeder fish-feeder wrote:

Lemmy,how about the FACT that the nga puhi chief David rankin says they wernt the first ones here? Or all the stories from the tribes around rotorua and taupo saying that they wernt here first...or the fact that the koru pa at taranaki was built at a time when there was clear evidence that not enough people were in NZ let alone taranaki to build it...and man it effectively....it was printed that it was built a long time before the maori were said to arrive? Or the spanish armour found at pouto,or the aboriginal boomerang found in dargaville,or the tamil bell found in wellington harbour,or the 7-8ft tall skeletons found in the raglan caves...with long platted red hair,and samples of a woven tartan cloth found with them.There is alot of evidence hidden and its sad,because its our history,european or maori,we have the right to know.Some sites are worthy of Unesco preservation,but DOC shoves it all under the carpet.
One tribe had its MDNA traced back to iran,as mentioned in the tribes stories,they always knew where and when they came from........


The thing that really gets me with this is they won't teach it in school.


Posted By: Capt Asparagus
Date Posted: 03 Oct 2014 at 9:32am
I haven't heard of any 8ft tall humans, let alone having a whole bunch of them turning up in nz ....they must've been a genetically enhanced NBA team from the 22nd century accidentally time warped back to a cave in nz huh?
:-)
Hell, even today's basketball teams have no (or at least vanishingly few) 8 footers...that is over 2.4m.... Nah man, I don't believe any b.s. about such skellingtins.

-------------
It is only my overwhelming natural humility that mars my perfection.

Captain Asparagus, Superhero, Adventurer.


Posted By: A C
Date Posted: 03 Oct 2014 at 9:37am
Giants On Earth

Genesis 6:4 "The Nephilim were on the earth in those days--and also afterward--when the sons of God went to the daughters of men and had children by them. They were the heroes of old, men of renown."

Giant's skeletons found on earth apparently range up to a towering 36ft in height.

"We saw the Nephilim there (the descendants of Anak come from the Nephilim). We seemed like grasshoppers in our own eyes, and we looked the same to them." - Numbers 13:33

The Annunaki, according to ancient Sumerian Texts are responsible for engineering mankind. According to the ancient texts they come from Nibiru. These ancient texts complement and concur with that which is written in the Bible. The Religion section of the Liberty For Life site contains some description and discussion on these issues. We are significantly concerned that our officials in the government may be hiding information regarding Nibiru. With our limited resources while under constant and outrageous assault from authorities, Liberty For Life is studying the issue relating to Nibiru. Of particular concern is the limited access and two year waiting list to utilize any of the more powerful telescopes around the world, which appear to be under the control of the Vatican/NWO crew. Also of concern is the recent censorship by the US military of space meteorites / space rocks: "A recent U.S. military policy decision now explicitly states that observations by hush-hush government spacecraft of incoming bolides and fireballs are classified secret and are not to be released, SPACE.com has learned." The FloridaToday.com site reveals "It's baffling to us why this would suddenly change," said one scientist familiar with the work. In 1983 it was announced that the IRIS space telescope had found Nibiru, this was quickly followed up with denials by NASA. Robert S Harrington, Head of the Naval Observatory Washington DC headed up NASA Planet X (Nibiru) internal study was on his final trip to New Zealand to photograph Planet X. He died suddenly of a mysterious cancer before he could return to the US with his photographs. Chuck Schramek the Huston News Host who took photos of Hale Bopp that is apparently on the same orbital path as Nibiru died of the same rapid onset cancer.

One must question why on earth the authorities are censoring such extraordinary finds? Why are they keeping us in the dark?





"If the "truth will set you free", clearly our authorities want to keep us as slaves." - SOC

We know much of what is known in these areas is being censored. The Internet however, representing a great tree of knowledge is breaking out this knowledge and bringing about the New Renaissance and Second Reformation.



Are/were "the sons of God" referred to in Genesis 6:2 the Annunaki the descendants of Anak referred to in Numbers 13:33?

Genesys 2:15 "The LORD God took the man and put him in the Garden of Eden to work it and take care of it. [16] And the LORD God commanded the man, "You are free to eat from any tree in the garden; [17] but you must not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, for when you eat of it you will surely die."

Genesis 3:22 "And the LORD God said, "The man has now become like one of us, knowing good and evil. He must not be allowed to reach out his hand and take also from the tree of life and eat, and live forever.""

Genesis 6:1-3 "When men began to increase in number on the earth and daughters were born to them, the sons of God saw that the daughters of men were beautiful, and they married any of them they chose. Then the LORD said, "My Spirit will not contend with man forever, for he is mortal; his days will be a hundred and twenty years.""

By C







A.- Present day modern man which averages about 6-feet tall + or - several inches or more.


B.- 15-foot human skeleton found in southeast Turkey in late 1950's in the Euphrates valley during road construction. Many tombs containing giants were uncovered here. This pertains to the picture of the giant human femur and myself above.


C.- Maximinus Thrax Ceaser of Rome 235-238 A.D. This was an 8' 6" skeleton.


D.- Goliath was about 9 feet + or - a few inches. I Samuel 17:4 late 11th century.


E.- King Og spoken of in Deuteronomy 3:11 whose iron bedstead was approximately 14-feet by 6-feet wide. King Og was at least 12-feet tall, yet some claim up to 18.


F.- A 19'6" human skeleton found in 1577 A.D. under an overturned oak tree in the Canton of Lucerne.


G.- 23-foot tall skeleton found in 1456 A.D. beside a river in Valence, France.


H.- A 25' 6 " skeleton found in 1613 A.D. near the castle of Chaumont in France. This was claimed to be a nearly complete find.


I.- Almost beyond comprehension or believability was the find of the two separate 36-foot human remains uncovered by Carthaginians somewhere between 200-600 B.C.



Source for the above information:
Joe Taylor, Mt. Blanco Fossil Museum
124 West Main St., P.O. Box 550, Crosbyton, TX 79322
(805) 675-7777 (office) and (806) 675-2421 (fax)
http://www.mtblanco.com




Mummified remains of man taller than a train.


NOTE OF HOAX GIANT PICTURE. The Picture Show Below is a Hoax. It was created in a contest at Cornell University to fake photographs: http://www.graphics.cornell.edu/outreach/mastodon/.



The original photograph can be seen below which was taken at a Mastodon skeleton dig:



Liberty For Life
C

Well you have now Can'n

-------------
Aye-Aye cloth eyes.


Posted By: fish-feeder
Date Posted: 03 Oct 2014 at 10:21am
 
http://www.elocal.co.nz/view_Article~id~818~title~ELocaL%20COMMUNITY%20MAGAZINE%20-%20View%20Articles.html
http://www.elocal.co.nz/view_Article~id~122%20%20%20%20%20%20%20.html" rel="nofollow - http://www.elocal.co.nz/view_Article~id~122%20%20%20%20%20%20%20.html
 
for those that are sceptical and care to read
 


-------------
dont get my personality mixed up with my attitude,my personality is me,my attitude depends on you.


Posted By: AlexFyssher
Date Posted: 03 Oct 2014 at 11:33am
Originally posted by fish-feeder fish-feeder wrote:

 

http://www.elocal.co.nz/view_Article~id~818~title~ELocaL%20COMMUNITY%20MAGAZINE%20-%20View%20Articles.html


http://www.elocal.co.nz/view_Article~id~122%20%20%20%20%20%20%20.html" rel="nofollow - http://www.elocal.co.nz/view_Article~id~122%20%20%20%20%20%20%20.html

 

for those that are sceptical and care to read

 


Very compelling


Posted By: v8-coupe
Date Posted: 03 Oct 2014 at 12:20pm
Originally posted by Capt Asparagus Capt Asparagus wrote:

Hmmmmmmm....... 7 to 8 foot tall skeletons....who were they, aliens? Or super tall red haired Masai? :-)

What about the moriori though? (Try slipping moriori past bloody iPads autocorrect! Sheeesshhhh)

I would not be surprised the Chinese visited here, given the Chinese DNA in Maori, that could have happened. Forget the phonecians, celts etc though, that is just fantasy.


The Phonecians "did" make it to Australia. There is undeniable proof. So why would you write them off as not making it to New Zealand?
Maori did not build in stone yet there are stone walls attributed to Maori that have since been dated to before their arrival and at least one stone village. Currently being systematically destroyed and experts denied access for evaluation purposes. Why?.
Agree with another poster. It does not matter where they came from or who they are. They are all part of New Zealand's history and we should be afforded the truth no matter how painful it might be to some.
I too have heard the conspiracy theories. Why have some documents/finds been embargoed and kept from public/scientific scrutiny? What is there to hide? Aliens maybe? Who knows. While they are kept secret there will always be speculation.
Open them up and quell any doubts either way. New Zealand as a whole is owed the truth. What ever it is.

-------------
Legasea Legend Member


Posted By: v8-coupe
Date Posted: 03 Oct 2014 at 12:30pm
Originally posted by Capt Asparagus Capt Asparagus wrote:

I haven't heard of any 8ft tall humans, let alone having a whole bunch of them turning up in nz ....they must've been a genetically enhanced NBA team from the 22nd century accidentally time warped back to a cave in nz huh?
:-)
Hell, even today's basketball teams have no (or at least vanishingly few) 8 footers...that is over 2.4m.... Nah man, I don't believe any b.s. about such skellingtins.


I watch a wee bit of Time Team. Too much probably. They had a similar problem with an Anglo Saxon woman's grave. Apparently she was six foot tall. Extremely tall for that period, let alone for a woman of that period. Once the bones had been removed and reassembled it was discovered she was really only around five foot two from memmory..Ground subsidence and other factors had worked to stretch the buried skeleton. Who is to say that is not what had happened to the eight foot tall skeletons discovered and due to processes at the time no further research was done. I believe I read they were found around Lake Taupo after an earthquake opened a hidden cave/cavern.
Once again. If this find is authentic. Open the documents and evidence for discussion and evaluation. Not hide it away in the National archives.

-------------
Legasea Legend Member


Posted By: fish-feeder
Date Posted: 03 Oct 2014 at 1:04pm
the skeletons were found in caves in raglan,the local iwi were called in by doc,then the site was caved in or bulldozed,as per usual with items of interest.
cut and paste from website.
New Zealand’s early history was openly outlined in books available to schools. Suddenly, books were withdrawn, a new ‘revised’ history appeared and the original, pre-Maori inhabitants disappeared from public view.

Maori have always spoken of a race of fairer skinned people who preceded them. They called them "Patu-paiarehe" or Turehu, and some still trace a shared lineage. In 1867, a Ngati Whatua Tohunga (amongst other things the Tohunga was a tribal historian whos job it was to memorise and recite the tribes family tree) stated that the Ngati Whatua came to New Zealand from the Cook Islands nine generations earlier, making landfall at a place called Hatarau (Little Barrier Island).

Arriving there they encountered a race a people with "fairer complexions than those of the Maori" (with a reddish/bronze tinge) their hair was of the dull golden or reddish hue , whom they called uru-kehu (which is a word that describes the hair colour). They took the women to breed from - the males as slaves and food.

Note: Waitaha (the "first" peoples) comprised three different peoples:

1) The Moriori, (dark, brown-skinned like the maori) who at the time were said to be giants, ranging between 6 and 8 ft tall and superb gardeners.

2) The Urukehu/(Kerepehu/Patupaiarehe), a people with "fairer complexions than those of the Maori" (with a reddish/bronze tinge) their hair was of the dull golden or reddish hue “uru-kehu,” said to be of much smaller stature (between 3.5-5 ft tall) also known as the Starwalkers who were skilled at reading the geometry of the stars and were the navigators guiding the people to this land.

3) The Kiritea or Stone people, who came from Asian lands (Kiritea is a shade of brown lighter than Maori with a tinge of yellow) these peoples ultimately integrated to form one people the "Waitaha"

Cont:
There are Maori who speak of babies stolen long ago by a "fairy people" who hid in the bush, only coming out at night – an understandable action given he circumstances. I think they wanted to replace thier people who were being killed faster than they could breed. It is also highly possible that children taken were born to their own women captured by Maori.

One of the sub-tribes of the Patu-paiarehe was called the Ngati Hotu, pockets of whom still survive today (with maori blood also). Here’s a description of them from Maori oral history: "Generally speaking, Ngati Hotu were of medium height and of bronze-fair colouring. In the majority of cases they had reddish hair. They were referred to as urukehu.

It is said that during the early stages of their occupation of Taupo they did not practice tattooing as later generations did, and were spoken of as "te tamariki a Rangi" (the children of heaven) because of their fair skin. There were two distinct types: One had bronze skin, a round face, small eyes and thick protruding eyebrows. The other was the Turehu. They had white hair and buey-green eyes. They were fair-skinned, much smaller in stature, with larger and very handsome features." Note: The cavern dwellings and stone walls of these people can still be seen at Taupo, but are unprotected and under threat from development.

My step-father was close friends with a man who said he was the last full blooded Moriori and that (at 92yrs) he was not long for this world. He told him "i have a secret to share with you my friend, this is something that only i know as its too dangerous for me to share. But i need to share it with someone i trust before i go (from this world) you must promise me to only share this with another if you too are about to pass on or to protect it, if the place becomes threatened.

He then took him to "the caves" where he saw many bones and also wall drawings and his friend explained it all. He kept this to himself for about 40 years. Then one day when i was about 16 he was reading the local paper and leapt up off his chair yelling "quick find Noel Hilliams number" (Noel the old curator of the local museum) (my step-father had read that they had started excavations in the cave area...it had come tme to tell the secret his friend had entrusted to him) and then it all grew from there, along with my interest in my ancestory.

A cache of bones was found in the Kaipara District in 2005 in a cave. Investigations were handed over to Noel Hilliam, retired Curator of the Dargaville Maritime Museum, and his team of researchers. The skeletons showed that there were, at least, three distinct physical types of pre-Maori interned there, ranging from the very tall people (around 7 to 8 feet in height - 2.4 metres), to people of normal stature, to the very small pygmy people.

 


-------------
dont get my personality mixed up with my attitude,my personality is me,my attitude depends on you.


Posted By: Titahi
Date Posted: 03 Oct 2014 at 1:05pm
"Maori did not build in stone yet there are stone walls attributed to Maori",
 
I was going to ask you to expand on this, but on second thoughts DONT.
 
Maori it is commonly excepted where perefctly capable of intricatly  carving bone, Ponamu, and wood,  constructing weaved fishing nets form  Flax building ocean going multi hulled canoes...........but the thought of stacking some locally sourced stones on top of each other to form a wind break for kumara is to much to accept?
 
 
 
 
Addit:
Fish feeder:
I think your dad took you hook line and sinker, Tommy Solomon  was born and lived on the chathams, can you think of any reason he would whakapapa back to the Kaipara and be finding caves in Nga Puhi, that no one else knew about?  Retorical question, DONT answer it
 
 
http://www.teara.govt.nz/en/biographies/2s35/solomon-tommy" rel="nofollow - http://www.teara.govt.nz/en/biographies/2s35/solomon-tommy


-------------
"I love standing by the ocean and just knowing what its for"


Posted By: Skoti
Date Posted: 03 Oct 2014 at 1:24pm
Another interesting site to view .....
http://www.celticnz.co.nz/" rel="nofollow - http://www.celticnz.co.nz/


-------------
COVID is no joke !
One former patient was so brain damaged after , he thought he won an election he lost by 7 million votes .


Posted By: fish-feeder
Date Posted: 03 Oct 2014 at 1:27pm
that was a cut and paste from another site,not my work,as it said. I dont doubt maori stacked stones at all,but i doubt they carved stone and made alters to gods they didnt worship.
All im saying is there is evidence of other races here before maori,but it is the local "iwi" that get the decision to destroy it all,why is that if I may ask?
Ive been to the waipoa forest myself when I lived in waihui up there,and i got a nice note left on my car when I got back saying I was a tresspasser and that next time I would pay for it,what are people trying to hide up there,surely they should be proud of their heritage and what they made,if infact they did.
Its the countrys history,not one select peoples history


-------------
dont get my personality mixed up with my attitude,my personality is me,my attitude depends on you.


Posted By: Titahi
Date Posted: 03 Oct 2014 at 1:44pm
Apologies for the inference your dad pulled your leg, I didnt see where you referenced the article from and assumed that you had written it.
 
Have you considered the note was left on your car by some Waimamaku fella who was concerned you where about to stumble on there crop?  Not the  "people"  just one person.....


-------------
"I love standing by the ocean and just knowing what its for"


Posted By: fish-feeder
Date Posted: 03 Oct 2014 at 1:52pm
thats allgood man. I thought of many reasons for the note left on my car,but I doubt there would be any crops under all the pines up there to be honest,and Im not the only person its happened to as I found out after reading an article by  archeologist martin doutre,ill try find it.
 
Heres the article on skeletons found in various areas.....cut and pasted PDF
 

Ancient burial methods

One 19th century report from the fi ord area of the South Island

spoke of humans remains in a limestone cave that were so old that

a stalactite had partially encased the petrifi ed remains.

Skeletons of the ancient people have been observed, frequently,

since the earliest colonial time, in burial caves or in a sitting

(trussed position) in sand dunes, with artefacts beside them.

The trussed burial is a typical type of pre-Maori burial. Around

Kekerengu in the Kaikoura area of the South Island a large

number of these have been found, reportedly with a moa egg

with each trussed skeleton, a burial method similar to ancient

burials in Costa Rica, where round stone balls accompanied

the deceased into the afterlife. One such burial was found

on Pigeon Mountain near Howick with a pumice ball found

with the deceased.

Some bodies found in caves around the Raglan region were

encased in Kauri gum, while in both Raglan and the Waima

Range there are dry mummifi ed remains in caves. Another

ancient custom practiced by the pre-Maori people was

to take the bodies to an open air location where the body

tissues could eaten by carrion birds, like the black-backed

seagull. The remains would stay there for a year or so in the

elements until the relatives returned to gather the bones and

stack them neatly into a bundle. These would then be carried

to and deposited in a burial cave or rock fi ssure. Others were

placed on a carved wooden tray held by a menacing looking

statuette fi gure the purpose of which was scare anyone who

wanted to come and disturb the remains. Several of these

were located in the Waima Range around Waimamaku,

Hokianga District.

Some burials were in stone hewn coffi ns, such as a number

observed in different locations around the Wanganui River

region. (see photo Turehu coffi ns)

Those found in burial caves often had red hair or other light

brown and blond hues. Samples of their braided hair, taken

from the Waitakere rock shelters, used to be on display at

Auckland War Memorial Museum and were the subject

of written commentary by Maori anthropologist, Sir Peter

Buck. Our earliest maritime explorers frequently saw the,

red headed, freckle-faced Maori or “waka blondes” and large

pockets of them survived well into the 20th century as people

who had never mixed their blood with colonial era European

settlers. These days, when ancient, pre-colonial European

Caucasoid skeletons are located, they are handed over to the

local iwi and no scientifi c investigation is permitted.

An example of this happened in1995 on a Manutahi farm

in Taranaki. The remains of 12 skeletons in a formal pre-

European burial ground were unearthed by contractors

doing earthworks. The bones were removed and reinterred,

reluctantly, at Manutahi Marae where elders said they should

have been left where they were. Michael Taylor, a private

archaeologist from Wanganui, was called in by the NZ

Historic Places Trust to assess the discovery. He said the

burial site “defi nitely pre-dates European settlement due to

the style of burial, state of the bones and the presence of what

may have been woven fl ax. Something like this is a signifi cant

discovery because it is an unrecorded formal burial site. I’ve

been in archaeology for over 20 years and this is the fi rst time

I have seen anything like this.”

Since the fi nd, more evidence has fi ltered through. This tells

us that the bones of each skeleton unearthed were in woven

bags, but the material was not fl ax; The burial site was a

formally organised location, totally unknown to the local

iwi by their own admission. It’s evident that they had no

history of burials at this location and in this unique manner;

The fi nal burial had occurred in swamp or bog land and

was similar to the bog burials of Britain. No photography or

forensic analysis of the well preserved skeletal remains and

accompanying materials to determine their age, ethnicity or

physical anthropology was permitted.

Turehu coffi ns. These skeletons have recognisable European

physiology. They were already very old when found in rugged

country, far from any European churchyard and with stone hewn

coffi ns.

A blowup of the picture positively shows a side view of a

jaw (mandible) which is not Maori, but European. Maori

predominantly have a “rocker jaw” with a continuous downwards

curve on the lower border. Further to that, the eye sockets of

these people are squarish, the nose openings pyramidal, the

faces long and narrow (dolicephalic skull type) and the craniums

very round with a high vault.



-------------
dont get my personality mixed up with my attitude,my personality is me,my attitude depends on you.


Posted By: cirrus
Date Posted: 03 Oct 2014 at 1:57pm
one thing we know about ancient history is that we really dont know much. Often the same word will crop up in language. Coincidence or not?

For example Tiri.  Tiri  Tiri is an island in the H.G. Tiri is also found in Lebanon, Azerbaijan ,C.A.R & also in the Baltic nation of Estonia where a town in the South East is called Tiri.


Posted By: southernwanderer
Date Posted: 03 Oct 2014 at 2:02pm
Some of this makes for interesting reading, but its like arguing over creationism with fundamentalist christians, what they believed is true and if it doesn't match their beliefs/theories must be wrong, even in light of overwhelming scientific proof. So dopey twat in the 1600s(?) said the world is 6500yrs old, and Noahs flood was 5000yrs ago, yeah right, gimme a tui! Blinded by belief, they chose ignore, condemn, and criticise anything that contradicts that! Why? It's all about power, has been through out history! If you control knowledge you control what people think, true or not, that gives you control of people, that gives you power.
The sons of Adam and Eve fought, Cain killed Able, what did modern mans ancestors do to his brothers the Neanderthals, most say that they where killed off! Similarities!


Posted By: fish-feeder
Date Posted: 03 Oct 2014 at 2:07pm
another bit of interesting info on language from the first url I linked on the other page...its feedback from a reader on the story written....
 
 
SOME I THINK ARE UNDENIABLE FACTS OF MAORI PLACE NAME ,RELIGION AND CULTURE BEFORE PAKHEYA.FIRSTLY THERE ARE SOME THINGS THAT I BELIEVE TO BE TRUE ABOUT THIS SO CALLED CONSPIRACY THEORY OF INDO GREEK SAILORS SETTLING IN PACIFIC.I SPEAK A FORM OF GREEK WHICH IS PROBABLY IS THE CLOSEST FORM OF GREEK TO ANCIENT GREEK IN MODERN TIME, IONIAN FROM CONSTANTINOPOLIS. I HAVE NOT HEARD MAORI BEFORE OR READ IT. IM NOW READING SOME MAORI AND UNDERSTANDING THERE BELIEF AND LANGUAGE JUST BY SAYING SOME THINGS IN IONIC GREEK SAILOR SLANG(MY GRANDFATHER WAS A SAILOR.)OAMOURU IS PLACE OF SAND IN GREEK O AMMOU OR O AMMOURAE.... OMARAMA MEANS THE ROCKS IN GREEK???????OK WHAT IS THIS PLACE FAMOUS FOR ???OPAGOU IS PLACE OF ICE IN GREEK>> IN MAORI> OTAGO ?????? CAN YOU TELL ME WHERE OTAGO CAME FROM???SO YOU SEE HOW MAORIS ARE DESCENDENDED FROM INDO GREEK SAILORS THAT WENT BEYOND THE MAPPED WORLD UNFORTUNATELY IT WAS A ONE WAY TRIP.. THEY CAME IN SEVEN CANOES FROM THE NORTH . THEY ALREADY SETTLED IN NEW CALEDONIA. MICRONESIA,TAHITI MOOREA COOK ISLANDS .THEY MIXED WITH LOCAL MELANESIAN AND WERE LIKE ROYALTY.. SOON THE FEATURES OF THE PEOPLE WERE CHANGED . STRAIGHT HAIR LIGHTER SKIN . Expert boat builders and sea faring was a greek SAILORS way of life. His boat VAKA? IN GREEK.. WAKA ???? IN MAORI.. was his woman his son his daughter .IT WAS HIS RELIGION THEY SOON EXPLORED WHOLE OF NEW ZEALAND AND A LOT OF EVIDENCE IS AROUND. GREEKS WOULD HAVE PRAYING AREAS MADE OF ROCK LIKE SMALL SHRINES TO PRAY TO GODS ON LONG JOURNEYS THROUGH TREACHEROUS MOUNTAINS..THEY WERE USUALLY BUILT BY THE SIDE OF THE PATH .THESE ROCKS THAT ARE FORMED IN SOME PLACES ARE THE REMAINS OF THIS.YOU TOUCH THEM.... BAD TIKI. ?GREEK TICHI ?..MEANS.LUCK . YET ANOTHER GREEK WORD. HAERE MAI ....IS.. HAERE TAI ....IN GREEK HELLO WELCOME ?? DO YOU SEE WHAT WE ARE SAYING.?? WE HAVE TO EDUCATE PEOPLE ON THIS BECAUSE FOR INSTANCE OTAGO DOES NOT HAVE A ORIGIN FOR NAME?? I TELL YOU IT IS OPAGOU??. PAGOU IS ICE ..OPAGOU IS PLACE OF ICE.... PLEASE CAN YOU NOT DISREGARD THIS . THIS IS ONLY A FRACTION OF EVIDENCE THAT IS AVAILABLE MAORI > NGA MAHI KOHURU A NGA PUHI . TO LEARN OR DO AND TO SAY OR TEACH ?
IN GREEK> NA MATHE KAI NA PEHI ??? . TO LEARN OR DO AND TO SAY OR TEACH. IT IS THE SAME FROM ORAL RELIGION PASSED DOWN.?? MATARIKI IS GREEK SAILOR SLANG FOR EYES OVER THERE, MEANING SAILING STARS PLEIADES! GREEKS AND ROMANS WERE EXCLUDED FROM OTHER EUROPEANS AS NOT BEING PAKHEAS WHY??? BECAUSE INDO GREEK PEOPLE ARE A PART OF MAORI PEOPLE FOR SURE THERE SHOULD NOT BE ANY DOUBT.. WHY SHOULD THERE BE CONSPIRACIES??? ONLY TRUTHS SHOULD NOT BE SWEPT UNDER THE CARPET????. I MEAN DONT YOU WANT TO KNOW TRUE MEANING OF THE BEAUTIFUL PLACE YOU HAVE THERE IN CENTRAL OTAGO. THERE IS NO ORIGIN FOR NAME . IM NOT WELL EDUCATED AT ALL AND WOULD THINK THAT EDUCATED PEOPLE WOULD FIND OUT LIKE I HAVE...THIS IS NOT SOME SAILORS STOPPING FOR A BREAK. THIS IS MAORI CULTURE, RELIGION PLACE NAMES AND LANGUAGE..... MAORI NGA MAHI KOHULU A NGA PUHI ..... GREEK NA MATHE KAINA PEHI ... THIS MEANS TO LEARN AND DO THEN TO SAY AND TEACH . IT IS GREEK NO DOUBT . NOW IT IS MAORI OF COURSE MAORIS ARE WONDERFUL CULTURED PEOPLE. HAKA IS ACHAE WHICH MEAN TO THUNDER WITH VOICE LIKE ECHO IN ENGLISH WAS TAKEN FROM GREEK ACHAE.IM WRITING IN ROMAN TEXT SO I DONT COMPLICATE. BORA BORA IN TAHITI MEANS SUNSHOWER IN GREEK BUT TWICE BECAUSE OF TWO MOUNTAIN.



-------------
dont get my personality mixed up with my attitude,my personality is me,my attitude depends on you.


Posted By: fish i
Date Posted: 03 Oct 2014 at 2:44pm
Waitaha, yes. Urukehu, yes. Patupairehe you've got your wires dramatically crossed there. 

There are links in most languages around the world, a lot in indigenous languages. Mata - is also referred to as eyes throughout Polynesia, the wider pacific and parts of SE Asia. Basing the word matariki to summate greek physical presence throughout the pacific well... Those are assumptions and suppositions at best. Good ones to question, pursue and research further, but suppositions none the less. 

They kind of read as ramblings of someone who has gone off the deep end, not always a bad thing to get to the source. Not the most coherently written piece. All over the show.  There could well be some truth and validity laid in there somewhere, pretty wild thou.

We have been looking at ancient texts of a 'great explorer' from Egypt called Mo'w'e'. That's getting fairly interesting.


-------------
6th place in the inaugural Te Kauwhata Regionals paddle crab division


Posted By: Reel Deal
Date Posted: 03 Oct 2014 at 4:34pm
Lemmy what did we start
Some interesting stuff coming through but.

The best "evidence" that I know of, was during the building the Aotea Centre in Auckland when digging foundations a tree trunk was found with very visible chopping signs on it and a stone adze found stuck in the trunk. The thing was it was below a volcanic explosion ash layer that pre dated Polynesians immigrating to NZ by a number of thousands of years.

Now I wouldn't call it hard evidence as I can't remember where I saw the picture and read the article but I think early a nz herald article.

Re language interestingly as I travel the pacific for work and trying to learn local languages the word Kai means food in Maori. In PNG many of the 800 languages say Kai Kai for food but in Samoa kai means sh#t which I learnt the hard way insulting my host when attempting to thank for the Umu put on in my honer.

Thinking when the future Maori left Samoa they ran out of food and had to eat anything they could and Kai got a new significance :-)


-------------
The gods do not subtract from the allotted span of men's lives the hours spent on fishing - Assyrian Proverb


Posted By: pjc
Date Posted: 03 Oct 2014 at 4:53pm
can this be tied to what is hidden in the waipoua forest?

-------------
Sex at 58.Lucky I live at 56


Posted By: lemmy
Date Posted: 03 Oct 2014 at 5:21pm
I reckon Reel Deal LOL
Lots of quite interesting information none new to me yet, most probably well written fiction written by people with some hidden agenda.

 That tree stump you are referring to was found under the Art Gallery although it mysteriously went missing soon after I think it was around 1920,s but I mite be wrong my memory is fading.

Most people agree there were a few migrations of Maori into New Zealand as much as a couple of hundred years apart and the people those Nga Puhi saw when they arrived were probaly from an earlier voyage from Polynesia the later migrants were more a warrior race due to overpopulating in their homeland which led to turf wars over there while the earlier migrants here seem to be more of a peaceful people probably the reason a lot of them were slaughtered and ended up in the Hangi Pit.

I went into my research with open eyes probably more leaning towards wanting to believe there were lost tribes of Vikings ,Celts , Chinamen ,or Egyptians here before Maori but after numerous discussions with some pretty knowledgeable archaeologists at Auckland university and hundreds of hours of studying historical information I came out the other end a non believer there’s lots of theory’s and conspirators out there but they are backed up by no actual physical proof.

Another story I heard was they found a Viking ship in Europe that had been repaired with Kauri at some stage of its life again after much research just a really good story nothing else.
Please someone prove me wrong I am just as interested as every other Kiwi in our History.     


Posted By: Reel Deal
Date Posted: 03 Oct 2014 at 6:48pm
It's a hard one Lemmy, we know the government for decades has been hiding something as they classify everything found to be held secret and even deny their existence, why??

But talking about old stories (might interest you pjc)

My grandfather could speak maori, not the modern type. He was schooled by the old folk and when we were young (along time ago) he used to tell us stories he was told when he was a kid. One was re Pirongia mountain near rags which was a strong hold of the" fairy people" as they were known locally. There was alot of interaction between the Maori ands the Fairy People when the Maori first landed but it wasn't long before things turned bad. The Maori had huge respect for their adversaries. So much so as when they came across the fairy people's gardens in the forest they would shout out that if the gardens were still there the next day they would be taken. In the night the gardens were harvested before the maori would return. The fairy people of light complexion and red hair were very apt at moving and hiding in the forest but there numbers were declining in the raglan area as the Maoris numbers increased and they eventually retreated to the Pirongia mountains. It was about this time a famous chef of the fairy people started fighting back in a big way. Hit and run styles and always in the night. One night he personally broke into the local Maori chefs whare and stole his daughter who was held captive for 4 years in the Pirongia Mountains during which she married the famous fairy Chef. She learnt there language and customs and worked with them as one of them, then she got a chance to escape. She made it back to her tribe but the tribe though happy were fearful when she told them of the marriage, they were sure they would be attacked. But she new that the fairy people would never pass over red clay ore and instructed the tribe to collect and spread the red clay around the windows and doors not leaving a gap. Sure enough the chef arrived on his own one night and on seeing the clay screamed and baited the warrors throwing rocks at the roofs demanding his wife back. The tribe hide in fear and the fairy chef returned for 3 more nights and on the last night climbed onto the meeting house roof and quietly sang songs of love till dawn.

There after the fairy people were rarely seen but the Maori could often hear them singing but invisable in the fiorest. The local Maori also didn't like fog in the forest as they feared that's when they were most vulnerable.

Anyway old stories.


-------------
The gods do not subtract from the allotted span of men's lives the hours spent on fishing - Assyrian Proverb


Posted By: pjc
Date Posted: 03 Oct 2014 at 7:07pm
"real deal"my aunt recits about the fairy people as well.
Interesting about the old maori language as well.a old maori at the aunties resthome says he cannot fully understand the spoken maori on te kare?maori news.


-------------
Sex at 58.Lucky I live at 56


Posted By: lemmy
Date Posted: 03 Oct 2014 at 7:13pm
Not sure why some information has remained classified.........., although I do know "The Stone villages" in the Waipoua Forest have been mapped and studied extensively by Archaeologists, and they had access to all the information  and were found to be little more than agricultural excavations by local Maori not collapsed Fairy cottages ,theres numerous sites around New Zealand where Maori constructed basic Stone structures or simply just piled stones up to allow easier cultivation of the land.
Maori loved a good ghost story then and still do, I,ve got Maori mates who I hunt with in the Urewera,s who still start freaking out and crapping themselves when you start telling stories about the Children of the Mist while sitting around the campfire probaly why the the Fairy people legends gained some momentum.


God I wish this wind would die off so we can go fishing .LOL


Posted By: pjc
Date Posted: 03 Oct 2014 at 7:21pm
http://www.elocal.co.nz/view_Article~id~122%20%20%20%20%20%20%20.html

interesting


-------------
Sex at 58.Lucky I live at 56


Posted By: Godders
Date Posted: 03 Oct 2014 at 8:05pm
Yes and then traded it in on a 500 year ol
d centre console the other guy was pi@#ed.


Posted By: fish-feeder
Date Posted: 03 Oct 2014 at 9:27pm
nga puhi is the maori all of us hear these days PJC

-------------
dont get my personality mixed up with my attitude,my personality is me,my attitude depends on you.


Posted By: fish-feeder
Date Posted: 03 Oct 2014 at 9:33pm
heres food for thought. is NZ the only country to be inhabited for such a short time,I mean only 600-800 yrs ago people landed here. Thats where I call big BS,we are at the end of a massive tidal drift from the west most of the year round,wood floats,people always want to see whats over the horizon.

-------------
dont get my personality mixed up with my attitude,my personality is me,my attitude depends on you.


Posted By: smudge
Date Posted: 03 Oct 2014 at 9:37pm
Strangely i've never felt the urge to drift the oceans on a piece of wood until i find a new land. About the only sensible post on this thread was AC's and I didn't understand a word of it Big smile


-------------
Best gurnard fisherman in my street


Posted By: pjc
Date Posted: 03 Oct 2014 at 10:29pm
Originally posted by fish-feeder fish-feeder wrote:

nga puhi is the maori all of us hear these days PJC
should really go to resthome and sit down with the old fella and listen to his knowledge,some of the older community have more knowledge than what is written in books,my aunt at 90 is a living encyclopedia so was her mother at 103,need to tape record these people before its to late.mentioned to my  aunt a few weeks ago about 
waipoua forest and all she said it was tapu,so none the wiser,might have to put the pressure on.


-------------
Sex at 58.Lucky I live at 56


Posted By: the angler
Date Posted: 04 Oct 2014 at 12:05am
Originally posted by fish-feeder fish-feeder wrote:

Lemmy,how about the FACT that the nga puhi chief David rankin says they wernt the first ones here? Or all the stories from the tribes around rotorua and taupo saying that they wernt here first...or the fact that the koru pa at taranaki was built at a time when there was clear evidence that not enough people were in NZ let alone taranaki to build it...and man it effectively....it was printed that it was built a long time before the maori were said to arrive? Or the spanish armour found at pouto,or the aboriginal boomerang found in dargaville,or the tamil bell found in wellington harbour,or the 7-8ft tall skeletons found in the raglan caves...with long platted red hair,and samples of a woven tartan cloth found with them.There is alot of evidence hidden and its sad,because its our history,european or maori,we have the right to know.Some sites are worthy of Unesco preservation,but DOC shoves it all under the carpet.
One tribe had its MDNA traced back to iran,as mentioned in the tribes stories,they always knew where and when they came from........


What else do you know about koru pa ? I live about a km away as the crow flies and can quite distinctly see 3 old pa sites from my kitchen window in fact where my house sits was most probably a pa site at some stage as there are old pits and bits and pieces all around us , my mrs and kids take the dogs for a walk over koru pa I didn't realise it had a contentious history, cool.


Posted By: bazza
Date Posted: 04 Oct 2014 at 10:06am
OK just to throw some more food for thought into the cooking pot, how many here have read the book simply titled "1421" & If you haven't would strongly suggest you do, your local library should have a copy.

It is written by Gavin Menzies a retired British submarine commander about a huge Chinese fleet of junks that set off to travel the world on a trade mission under the command of admiral Zheng. Now these were not the sort of junks we would think off as many were the size of mini aircraft carriers & the fleet even carried farm animals as well as some were concubine vessels where the crews could find "recreation solace" to relieve the boredom of extended periods at sea.

In his capacity as a submarine commander for many years Menzies was fascinated by discoveries that supported evidence of where this fleet had travelled & also where the currents would have taken them as apparently ocean going junks by virtue of their design are not suited to sailing against the wind therefore are largely reliant on ocean currents.

There have been several "knockers" of this theory so make up your own mind as to its' validity but I came to the conclusion that if only 10% of the many examples quoted were true then it is hard to deny the theory holds water .

Examples include :-

Potatoes / sweet pots / kumara etc. tubers native to Sth. American finding their way to a multitude of counties.
Breeds of chickens native to China now commonly existing in many countries.
Twin tracks of flat paving stones found where the gap between for a keel & the flat stones to suit flat hulls for hauling out
the junks for maintenance or repair.

Then comes the real doozy :-
It is claimed that a ships' bell from a junk was found buried in the sand on a Nth Is west coast beach & that was carbon dated as 14 th century. It further claims that Chinese DNA is found found to be present in some Maori, BUT only originating from female genes which it is theorised resulted from a concubine junk being washed ashore perhaps in a storm on the NZ coast.

The interesting conjecture was the claim that the European explorers such as Columbus, Tasman etc. were hardly likely to sail off to unknown parts of the oceans with only enough food & water for a one way trip unless they knew land existed
along with the proximity.

Menzies claims after approx. 5 yrs Zheng arrived back to China with the fleet much depleted by storms etc to find the emperor who had commissioned the expedition ordered the remaining fleet destroyed along with all records because in the interim his palace had been burnt down with the loss of his favourite concubine all of which he took to be a sign from the gods that they were extremely displeased at his having initiated the expedition.

According to the theory Zheng followed the emperors' orders to destroy everything but could not bare to destroy the charts from his travels before making copies & after his death the copies eventually became available on the black markets around the world such as existed at the time. That alone makes sense to me!

Read the book then make up your own mind.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gavin_Menzies

PS I understand Menzies has also written two sequels that I have yet to read.




-------------
When you cry, feel pain or sadness, no one notices your sorrow .... BUT
fart just ONE time !!!!!!!!!!!


Posted By: Reel Deal
Date Posted: 04 Oct 2014 at 1:50pm
Imagine a ship full of concubines washing up on your isolated beach
Yes I've read that book. They didn't just carry food but grew it on the massive Junk ships. Corn crops on the massive decks, herds of animals etc. The fish farms were odd i thought as why not a line over the side?would have been enough unless they were a fav type of eating fish.?


-------------
The gods do not subtract from the allotted span of men's lives the hours spent on fishing - Assyrian Proverb


Posted By: fish-feeder
Date Posted: 04 Oct 2014 at 4:03pm
Does anyone have a copy I could Bludge to read? Maybe the fish farms were so they ddnt have to stop sailing, by the size of the boats id assume they would be sailing fastish and wanted to tame full advantage of the seasonal tides while theywere strongest.... maybe

-------------
dont get my personality mixed up with my attitude,my personality is me,my attitude depends on you.


Posted By: Reel Deal
Date Posted: 04 Oct 2014 at 4:32pm
I think it wasnt till the titanic was a larger ship built and there were hundreds of them a true floating community/country with thousands of people /plants/ animals. What I thought bizarre for the time that they didn't go to conquer as being so advanced they could have but for collecting knowledge. They brought back exotic animals like giraffes and chefs,kings etc to meet with their emperor, then returned them all. They spread corn, sweet potatoes etc amongst the many countries they visited. The apparently visited nz during the years the went round and round the world. It's a interesting read anyway.

-------------
The gods do not subtract from the allotted span of men's lives the hours spent on fishing - Assyrian Proverb


Posted By: Lethal
Date Posted: 04 Oct 2014 at 4:56pm
the crud from the bottom of a fish farm would supply fertilizer for plants, its better than anything you can buy,
ive seen a few hydroponic veggie planter which use a fish pond to feed plants in a high rise building, just guessing why they would breed their own fish... 

-------------
Thanks for everything you did for us Eric. may you rest in peace, You were one of the real legends of NZ recreational fishing


Posted By: pjc
Date Posted: 04 Oct 2014 at 5:44pm
one would think the ships were not fast,drifted rather than sailed so time is no problem,as mentioned before maybe they had there species and were unsure what fish at sea was even edible?

-------------
Sex at 58.Lucky I live at 56


Posted By: Capt Asparagus
Date Posted: 04 Oct 2014 at 8:13pm
1421is a really interesting book. His follow up book about the Chinese triggering the renaissance is also really very interesting and is pretty well argued through, not as far fetched as it would initially seem.
Nz gets a mention in the original book, wondering why nz has two types of wild pigs, one European, one Asian, how the Kaimanawa horses got here, other stuff like that.
Worth a read eh.

-------------
It is only my overwhelming natural humility that mars my perfection.

Captain Asparagus, Superhero, Adventurer.


Posted By: bazza
Date Posted: 04 Oct 2014 at 8:24pm
Originally posted by fish-feeder fish-feeder wrote:

Does anyone have a copy I could Bludge to read? Maybe the fish farms were so they ddnt have to stop sailing, by the size of the boats id assume they would be sailing fastish and wanted to tame full advantage of the seasonal tides while theywere strongest.... maybe


Almost all the libraries have copies, or if not can get one in..

-------------
When you cry, feel pain or sadness, no one notices your sorrow .... BUT
fart just ONE time !!!!!!!!!!!


Posted By: lemmy
Date Posted: 04 Oct 2014 at 10:16pm
Very interesting stuff Bazza , thats the basis for people explaining all the cave paintings that feature reptiles, crocs etc in the South Island that a voyage of "Asian" mariners travelled down here after visiting our Ozzy mates.
Getting down here would be easy enough in a big Downwind type Junk leaving again and Sailing the wrong way home would be challenging?


Posted By: bazza
Date Posted: 05 Oct 2014 at 6:05am
Originally posted by lemmy lemmy wrote:

Very interesting stuff Bazza , thats the basis for people explaining all the cave paintings that feature reptiles, crocs etc in the South Island that a voyage of "Asian" mariners travelled down here after visiting our Ozzy mates.
Getting down here would be easy enough in a big Downwind type Junk leaving again and Sailing the wrong way home would be challenging?



Apparently this is where having been a submarine commander the author was as were the Chinese in their junks, familiar with ocean currents & claims they would have ideally suited to the voyage undertaken.

Read the book as am sure you will find it fascinating.

-------------
When you cry, feel pain or sadness, no one notices your sorrow .... BUT
fart just ONE time !!!!!!!!!!!



Print Page | Close Window